Equal opportunity at work
We have to change the institutions, not to fix the women
by
Benjamin Willenberg
related linsk:
NCCR MUST organised an international meeting for all scientists and those interested in Gender and Science organized by NCCR MUST and Ruhr-Bochum's Excellence Cluster RESOLV.
https://www.phys.ethz.ch/news-and-events/d-phys-news/2017/10/equal-opportunity-at-work.html
Details on the speakers and flyer
external page http://www.nccr-must.ch/nccr_must/news_4.html?3976
News item on the D-PHYS website
https://www.phys.ethz.ch/news-and-events/d-phys-news/2017/10/equal-opportunity-at-work.html
Prof. Keller gives answers to the following questions:
external page http://www.nccr-must.ch/advancement_of_women/eth_women_professors_forum.html
- Building a functioning network like the ETH WPF is resource-intensive – how did you manage to successfully develop it?
- Why is it that so few women aspire to a professorship in your own discipline, physics, or in another scientific discipline?
- You’ve mentioned structural barriers several times. Why, in your view, is the structural framework currently unfavorable?
- Apart from your personal motivation, and choosing the right moment, to what extent is the success of the ETH WPF influenced by other factors, such as senior management?
- You pointed out that individual disciplines are confronted with challenges of different kinds, calling for specifically tailored approaches. Could you give an example to illustrate that?
- Could you explain in more detail what the ETH WPF does and how it sees its role? What benefits does the network provide?
- Why did you seize the initiative to improve the situation of women in the natural sciences? Which of your personal qualifications, characteristics and skills were decisive for this step?
- By developing the ETH WPF, you’ve already managed to achieve important goals. What additional measures and steps are required to go beyond these goals?